Which CPU Would Do Better For Game Development i5 12400 or Ryzen5 5600?. AMD’s most popular CPU is pitted against an Intel rival that retails for about $100 cheaper in the $199 Intel Core i5-12400 vs. $299 Ryzen 5 5600X competition.
That may seem strange, but AMD stopped selling its Ryzen 5000 CPUs in the sub-$200 price range, allowing it’s older processors to hold the line as Intel opened a new front in the AMD vs. Intel price battle.
Even though they debuted almost two and a half years ago, the elderly Zen 2-powered Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 will continue to be the primary competitors for the 12400 based solely on pricing.
You’ll see that AMD’s $259 Ryzen 5 5600G APU targets a different market than those outdated Zen 2 chips and is more competitive.
As a result, the Ryzen 5 5600X, AMD’s least costly Zen 3 model, is the sole real rival for the 12400 in our benchmarks.
On our list of the Best CPUs for Gaming and CPU Benchmark hierarchy, Intel’s Alder Lake chips have already scored significant victories over more expensive Ryzen chips.
The hybrid x86 Alder Lake design from Intel, which combines quick performance cores (P-cores) and tiny efficiency cores (E-Cores), is the company’s most revolutionary architectural change in ten years, as demonstrated by our past comparisons.
Because of this, Intel outperforms AMD’s most advanced mainstream CPUs, especially in terms of price-to-performance metrics.
The Core i5-12400 lacks a hybrid architecture, nevertheless. It doesn’t utilize Gracemont-based cores for background operations because it has a more conventional design and only six P-Cores that are active.
This means that the new Windows 11-only Thread Director technology from Intel is not required for this six-core, 12-thread processor to allocate workloads to the appropriate cores.
Because of this, the 12400 is equally as effective in Windows 10 as it is in Windows 11, unlike Intel’s hybrid versions.
Intel Core i5-12400 gaming performance benchmarks compared to AMD Ryzen 5 5600X and Ryzen 5 5600G
In our Intel Core i5-12400 study, we conducted much more extensive testing, which is summarized in this piece.
In this article, we’ll concentrate on our Windows 11 test results, but Windows 10 users should get comparable results. We also conduct tests with an overclocked Core i5-12400 with increased power limits.
The $199 Core i5-12400 is somewhat faster than the $584 Core i9-11900K when used with inexpensive DDR4 memory at 1080p, but when the Core i5’s memory is set to DDR4-3800, it outperforms the 11900K by 1.9 percent in our cumulative performance test.
Even though the 11900K would win after overclocking, that is a remarkable generational performance improvement.
The Core i5-12400, running at factory settings, outperforms AMD’s venerable $299 Ryzen 5 5600X by 1.9 percent at 1080p.
After tweaking, the Core i5-12400 ties the overclocked 5600X, which is an impressive result for a $100 cheaper CPU.
The Ryzen 5 5600G, which costs $259, is unfairly compared to the Core i5-12400 because AMD’s APU, which costs more than the 12400, isn’t meant to be a direct rival.
Aside from the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600, the only other AMD processor in this price range is the $259 5600G.
Nevertheless, the Core i5-12400 outperforms the 5600G by 16.8% when using a discrete GPU and by 14% when configuring both processors.
The Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the 12400, though, if you’re seeking the highest performance without a discrete GPU.
Additionally, the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 seem strange compared to the 12400 because they both date from the previous generation Zen 2 architecture and are several years old.
However, once more, these are the only appropriate comparisons from the AMD camp. The Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 are both outperformed by the Core i5-12400 by 22.7 and 26%, respectively. As you might expect, overclocking the Ryzen chips accomplishes little to bridge that gap.
Naturally, switching to 1440p causes the GPU to become the bottleneck, drastically reducing the gap between the devices.
The higher refresh rates of Alder Lake’s lower resolution panels will be more advantageous to gamers.
The 99th percentile charts indicate more differences between the CPUs, although Windows 11 appears to have more erratic framerates than Windows 10.
With some titles favoring one architecture over the other, the AMD vs. Intel gaming fight is getting more competitive.
As a result, it’s best to decide based on the kinds of games that you usually play. Check out each test in the album mentioned above.
It’s important to note that while the synthetic benchmarks (such as the Futuremark suite and chess benchmarks) don’t always translate well to real-world gaming, they do demonstrate the raw computing power that game engines are exposed to.
Result: Intel wins
The Core i5-12400 dominates all other processors in its price range and, when run at stock settings, even outperforms the Ryzen 5 5600X and 5600G.
After tweaking, it even competes favorably with the 5600X, which costs an additional $100.
Although the Ryzen 5 3600X and 3600 shouldn’t be pitted against the 12400 because they perform differently, this is a sad fact due to AMD’s choice to give up on the low-end market.
Overall, it is evident that the Core i5-12400 is the current king of value gaming, providing an above-average level of performance at its price point with no obvious price/performance rivals.
To summarize what we have seen above in our guide when it comes to gaming, Intel processors seem to outperform the AMD ones.
Intel is very fast and also its price is somehow pock-friendly. I encourage you that if you want to do gaming, then be sure to try the Windows Intel processor, it will give you a great experience in your gaming industry.
In our comment section, please share with us your thought and we will be highly appreciated it. And also remember to watch the video below, it contains more information on our topic today.